7 min read
7 min read

On May 19, 2025, Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, accusing Beyoncé, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, and Oprah Winfrey of receiving “illegal campaign contributions” from Kamala Harris’s 2024 campaign.
He demanded a full investigation, calling it an “illegal election scam.” Trump questioned, “HOW MUCH DID KAMALA HARRIS PAY BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN… WHAT ABOUT BEYONCÉ? …AND HOW MUCH WENT TO OPRAH, AND BONO???” These public posts marked a major new round in Trump’s ongoing battle with celebrities.

Trump claimed that top celebrities took illegal endorsement money from Kamala Harris’s campaign. He called the payments “CORRUPT & UNLAWFUL.” Campaign finance records did show some production-related payments for events.
However, Oprah’s team denied personal fees on May 20, 2025. FEC rules allow fair-market-value payments for real services like performing or speaking, but they must be listed publicly. Trump’s accusations mixed real expense listings with unsupported claims of illegal celebrity payouts.

Trump’s May 16, 2025, post reignited his feud with Bruce Springsteen. Trump said, “Never liked him, never liked his music, or his Radical Left Politics… he’s not a talented guy, just a pushy, obnoxious JERK.”
He also called Springsteen a “dried-out ‘prune’ of a rocker.” This wasn’t the first attack, as Trump has criticized Springsteen since at least 2016. The timing followed Springsteen’s public support for Democratic candidates and his political statements.

On May 16, 2025, Trump posted, “Has anyone noticed that, since I said ‘I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT,’ she’s no longer ‘HOT?’” This followed Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris and her ongoing criticism of Trump.
He had also implied during the 2024 Super Bowl that her appearance was staged for politics. Swift never responded publicly to his May 2025 comment. This continued Trump’s long-standing pattern of targeting celebrities.

After Trump’s accusations on May 19, 2025, Oprah Winfrey’s team responded quickly. On May 20, 2025, Oprah said, “I did not take any personal fee” from Kamala Harris’s campaign.
Bono’s company had received funds for event services, but his team denied any direct endorsement payment. FEC rules allow campaigns to pay for legitimate services, but not personal endorsements.

Neil Young responded to Trump’s attacks on artists in a May 20, 2025, post on his official website. He wrote, “Bruce and thousands of musicians think you are ruining America,” urging Trump to “STOP THINKING ABOUT WHAT ROCKERS ARE SAYING. Think about saving America from the mess you made.”
Young also referenced the situation in Gaza and accused Trump of ignoring global issues. His remarks add to a growing chorus of artists pushing back against Trump’s political and personal attacks on celebrities and musicians.

Trump has repeatedly attacked celebrities who speak out against him or support Democrats. He often uses Truth Social to question their intelligence, talent, or loyalty. These personal insults are a major part of his political style.
He singles out actors and singers more than most politicians do, often mocking their looks or careers. This behavior stretches back to his presidency and has continued into the 2024 and 2025 election cycles.

Many celebrities have taken strong stands against Trump’s politics. Stars like Cher, George Clooney, Barbra Streisand, and Robert De Niro have made speeches, posts, or donations against him. They often endorse Democrats or speak at rallies.
Their platforms help spread political messages to millions of fans. Trump’s latest attacks target this group, especially those involved in the 2024 election events. His critics say these attacks aim to silence voices that reach wide and young audiences.

Since 2015, more than 50 musicians and estates have told Trump to stop using their songs. The Rolling Stones, Neil Young, Tom Petty’s estate, and the Village People all complained.
In April 2025, the Isaac Hayes estate sued Trump for using “Hold On, I’m Comin’” without permission. They allege 134 copyright violations. Artists don’t want their music played at Trump rallies, especially if it seems like an endorsement.

Artists can take legal action when campaigns use songs without permission. While event venues usually have performance licenses, those don’t cover campaign use or endorsement. If a campaign uses a song in a video or major event, it often needs a sync license.
Many artists say Trump’s campaigns skip these steps. That’s why they’ve sent cease-and-desist letters and filed lawsuits. The Isaac Hayes case in 2025 could set new legal rules on how political events use copyrighted music.

Celebrities have helped boost voter registration. Taylor Swift’s Instagram story in September 2023 led to 35,000 new voter signups in 24 hours. Among 18-year-olds, registrations spiked 1,226%.
Michelle Obama’s group “When We All Vote” helped register 1.4 million people during the 2020 election. These efforts show how famous voices can drive real voter action. Trump’s rants against celebrity involvement may be a response to their power to reach and influence first-time or younger voters.

In the 2020 U.S. election, the entertainment world gave over $110 million to federal campaigns. About 81% went to Democratic candidates. Big donors included Jeffrey Katzenberg, who gave $10 million.
Individual gifts were capped at $2,800 per election in 2020, though PACs allowed more. These totals show how active the music, film, and TV industries are in politics. Trump often criticizes this influence, especially when it goes against him.

By January 2025, Truth Social had about 6.3 million monthly active users, up from an average of 5.9 million in 2024. Monthly users peaked at 13.8 million in March 2024 and dropped to 2.1 million in June.
Most users (61%) are male, with the largest age group between 55 and 64 years old. Around 84% of users are from the U.S., and 61% identify as Republicans. The platform mainly hosts right-wing voices, creating an echo chamber where Trump’s posts quickly spread and gain traction.

In the 2024 election cycle, the Federal Election Commission required campaigns to list any payment over $200 for services, including celebrity appearances. These reports must include the name, date, amount, and reason for payment.
Paying stars to appear or perform is legal if the price is fair and the cost is listed. Campaigns face fines for hiding or mislabeling these expenses. Trump used legal listings to push his claims, but didn’t show any evidence of lawbreaking by celebrities.

When Trump insults celebrities who support Democrats, it can change how the public sees those endorsements. The attacks may also help the celebrities by drawing more attention.
For example, Taylor Swift’s voter posts gained a massive response. Trump’s harsh tone turns a normal endorsement into a political fight, changing how voters think.
Meanwhile, Taylor Swift’s Rhode Island mansion soars in value, recently rising from $17.75 million to $27.8 million amid a $1.7 million expansion project.

When Trump accuses stars of crimes like illegal payments, he faces defamation risks. Public figures can sue for defamation, but they must show “actual malice.” That means Trump knew it was false or ignored the truth.
The 2023 Dominion vs. Fox News case ended with a $787.5 million settlement over election lies. Celebrities might sue if Trump’s claims harm their reputations. As of May 2025, no lawsuits have been filed over the Truth Social rants, but legal experts are watching.
During the heated 2024 election, country singer Jason Aldean honored Trump with a song at the Liberty Inaugural Ball, performing “Try That in a Small Town” in support of him.
Do you think Trump’s claims will lead to legal action or fade away? Drop your thoughts below!
Read More From This Brand:
Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content right here on MSN.
This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.
Lover of hiking, biking, horror movies, cats and camping. Writer at Wide Open Country, Holler and Nashville Gab.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!