Taylor Swift No Longer Entangled in Blake Lively’s Legal Battle with Justin Baldoni

It looks like Taylor Swift is finally out of the courtroom drama that has been brewing between actress Blake Lively and actor-director Justin Baldoni.

What started as a complicated legal feud took a surprising turn recently when Baldoni’s team suddenly decided to back off from subpoenaing Swift.

If you’re just catching up, here’s everything you need to know about how the pop icon got dragged into this and why she’s now officially out of the picture.

Why Was Taylor Swift Subpoenaed in the First Place?

Earlier this month, news broke that Taylor Swift had been subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni’s legal team.

This caught fans and media off guard, especially since Swift wasn’t directly involved in the production of It Ends With Us, the movie at the center of the dispute.

Her only connection to the film was that she licensed one of her songs, My Tears Ricochet, for its soundtrack.

Swift’s spokesperson quickly clarified her position and made it clear she had nothing to do with the film beyond the music.

“Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie, she was not involved in any casting or creative decisions, she did not score the film, she never saw an edit or made any notes on the film, she did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release, and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history,” her rep stated.

The spokesperson also pointed out that Swift’s name was being used to generate media buzz rather than serve any real legal purpose.

“Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift’s name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case.“

Swift’s Team Fights Back

It didn’t take long for Swift’s legal team to move to quash the subpoena. They saw it as not only inappropriate but also completely irrelevant. And they weren’t alone in that opinion.

Blake Lively’s camp came forward in support of Swift, criticizing the attempt to involve her in the case. A spokesperson for Lively made a strong statement on May 22:

“We are pleased Baldoni’s legal team has withdrawn their harassing subpoenas to Taylor Swift and her law firm.”

They didn’t hold back when it came to condemning the tactics used by Baldoni’s side.

“The Baldoni and Wayfarer team have tried to put Taylor Swift, a woman who has been an inspiration for tens of millions across the globe, at the center of this case since day one. Exploiting Taylor Swift’s celebrity was the original plan in Melissa Nathan’s scenario planning document, and it continues to this day. Faced with having to justify themselves in federal court, they folded. At some point they will run out of distractions from the actual claims of sexual harassment and retaliation they are facing.”

Wild Accusations and Struck-Down Claims

Before the subpoena was dropped, Baldoni’s attorneys made a dramatic move by submitting a letter to the court.

In it, they claimed that Lively had threatened to release private text messages between her and Swift if the singer did not publicly support her. The allegation came from an unnamed “source” and was immediately met with backlash.

Lively’s attorney, Mike Gottlieb, dismissed the claim entirely.

He called the allegation “categorically false.”

Judge Lewis J. Liman wasn’t having any of it either. On May 15, he granted a motion to strike the letter from the record, calling it both “improper” and “irrelevant to any issue before this court.”

Behind the Lawsuit: What Sparked the Legal Battle

To understand how things got this far, we have to go back to December when Lively filed a lawsuit against Baldoni.

She accused him of harassment, unprofessional conduct on set, and launching a smear campaign against her after she spoke out.

Baldoni, who directed and co-starred with Lively in the film, denied all allegations.

In January, he hit back with a countersuit. This time, the lawsuit targeted not just Lively, but also her husband Ryan Reynolds and their publicity team. He accused them of defamation and extortion.

One of the more bizarre elements in the countersuit was a claim that Swift and Reynolds pressured Baldoni to accept a rewrite of the film’s script by Lively.

According to his team, there was even a meeting at the couple’s penthouse where Swift allegedly praised Lively’s writing to signal that Baldoni should fall in line.

Pop Culture Meets Courtroom Drama

The legal documents from Baldoni’s side didn’t stop there.

They even included a supposed text exchange in which Lively compared herself to Khaleesi from Game of Thrones and referred to her husband and Swift as her “dragons.”

Now that Taylor Swift is officially out of the picture, the focus shifts back to the central legal battle between Lively and Baldoni. Both lawsuits are scheduled to go to trial in March 2026.

While it’s unclear what the outcome will be, one thing is for sure: this is one of the most high-profile celebrity legal showdowns in recent memory.

And for Swifties everywhere, it’s a relief to know that their favorite pop star won’t be dragged into a courtroom for a case she had little to no involvement in.

Stay tuned, this legal drama is far from over.

TL;DR

• Taylor Swift is no longer subpoenaed in the legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni.
• The subpoena was dropped by Baldoni’s legal team, which had previously tried to involve Swift despite her minimal connection to the film It Ends With Us.
• Swift’s team clarified she had no role in the film’s production beyond licensing one song, My Tears Ricochet.
• Lively’s spokesperson supported Swift, calling the subpoena “harassing” and accusing Baldoni’s team of exploiting Swift’s fame to distract from the real legal issues.
• Swift’s rep called the subpoena clickbait, noting she never visited the set or had creative input in the film.
• Baldoni’s lawyers alleged Lively threatened to release private texts with Swift — an accusation Lively’s attorney denied as “categorically false.”
• A judge struck the letter from the record, calling it improper and irrelevant.
• The legal conflict began in December 2024, when Lively sued Baldoni for harassment and retaliation.
• Baldoni filed a countersuit in January 2025, alleging defamation and extortion by Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and their publicity team.
• He also claimed Swift and Reynolds pressured him into accepting Lively’s script changes, and that Swift praised the rewrite during a meeting.
• One bizarre detail in Baldoni’s filings included Lively comparing herself to Khaleesi and calling Swift and Reynolds her “dragons.”
• The combined trial is set for March 2026 and will address both Lively’s and Baldoni’s lawsuits.

If you liked this, don’t forget to follow us for more news and stories like this one.

If you liked this, you might also like:

• Blake Lively Lands on TIME100’s 2025 List as Lawsuit Looms
• Justin Baldoni’s Wayfarer Foundation Shuts Down

This article was made with AI assistance and human editing.