Was this helpful?
Thumbs UP Thumbs Down

Report claims Oscar voters avoided Ariana Grande nomination


Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande Butera arrive in Los Angeles.
Table of Contents
Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande at the Wicked: For Good premiere.

A surprise Oscar snub shocks fans

Many movie fans were surprised when Wicked For Good failed to earn major Oscar nominations. The film had strong buzz after the first movie performed well with critics and awards groups.

Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo were both expected to appear on nomination lists. When their names were missing, social media quickly filled with questions and theories about what went wrong.

Businessman voting online by digital tablet.

Reports point to voter discomfort

Some entertainment outlets reported that anonymous Academy voters told them they felt uncomfortable with certain promotional moments during the press tour; those comments are reported and remain unattributed to named members.

These claims spread quickly online, adding a new layer to the awards conversation. Fans began debating whether personal impressions may have influenced professional voting decisions.

Press and media camera video photographer on duty in public.

Press tour moments raised eyebrows

During the press tour, several emotional and physical moments went viral on social media. Some viewers felt the interactions seemed unusual, overly intense, or just difficult to interpret for casual audiences.

Clips from interviews, behind-the-scenes footage, and red-carpet appearances were widely shared across platforms. These moments quickly became part of the public narrative surrounding the film, its stars, and the broader online buzz.

Red carpet and barrier on entrance before the opening ceremony

Voters reportedly felt uneasy

Some reports quoted anonymous voters who described the promotional tone as forced or performative, though those comments are not confirmed by named Academy members.

These reactions may have influenced how some Academy members ultimately viewed the campaign. The situation highlights how public perception, media coverage, and viral moments can significantly shape awards-season outcomes.

Fans are waiting for autographs.

The aura moment goes viral

One widely shared moment involved the actresses describing each other’s auras during an interview. The exchange was emotional and caught many viewers off guard.

Some fans found it sweet and heartfelt. Others felt it reinforced the sense that the press tour had become more about viral moments than the film itself.

The word ATTENTION spelled out in individual letter tiles

Red carpet interactions draw attention

Photos and videos showed the actresses frequently holding hands, linking arms, and touching during interviews and red carpet appearances. Supporters viewed these gestures as a natural sign of friendship, trust, and mutual support.

Critics, however, felt that the constant physical contact sometimes distracted from the movie’s promotion. These mixed reactions quickly became part of the broader conversation about their public image and media presence.

Disappointed reaction's shown along with a phone.

Voters cite campaign fatigue

Some voters reportedly felt exhausted from seeing the same viral moments repeated across interviews, red carpets, and social media. They said the press tour, instead of being exciting, began to feel overwhelming and distracting.

Awards campaigns often rely on high visibility, but too much attention can backfire. This situation highlights how maintaining balance and pacing is crucial during a long, competitive awards season.

Neon sign of box office

Box office success did not help

Although Wicked For Good grossed more than $500 million worldwide, the film still received zero Oscar nominations this year.

This disconnect surprised many fans who expected strong sales to boost awards chances. It shows how the Academy can separate popularity from voting decisions.

Success concept with arrowhead.

Past success raised expectations

The first Wicked film earned multiple Oscar nominations and secured major wins, setting a high benchmark. That success naturally raised expectations for the sequel among fans, critics, and industry insiders alike.

When the follow-up was left out of nominations, the contrast felt striking. Comparisons between the two films quickly became a central topic of discussion across social media and entertainment circles.

Ariana Grande at an award show.

Awards groups showed mixed support

Ariana Grande earned nominations from several major awards groups this season, including the Golden Globes and Critics’ Choice Awards. That made her Oscar snub feel especially surprising and disappointing to many supporters and fans.

Cynthia Erivo also received recognition from select organizations for her performance. These mixed results created confusion and speculation about how Academy voters ultimately viewed the duo’s work in the film.

Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande Butera arrive in Los Angeles.

Fans debate fairness of the snub

Online, fans came to the defense of both Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo, questioning the validity of the anonymous voter comments. Many argued that personal discomfort or perceived awkwardness should not influence decisions about professional awards or the recognition of talent.

At the same time, some acknowledged that voters are human and can be influenced by public behavior. The ongoing debate highlights how emotions and perceptions often shape awards-season conversations and fan reactions.

Colorful blocks spelling the word FUTURE.

Industry watches for future impact

Industry observers say studios and publicists may study this campaign as a case study in balancing visibility and voter fatigue during future awards seasons.

Public image and on-camera behavior may play an even bigger role in shaping how stars approach interviews and promotional appearances.

Studios and PR teams may also rethink their strategies for managing press tours and red-carpet events. The scenario could influence how future films balance viral moments, fan engagement, and traditional promotion while keeping the focus on the movie itself.

Curious how this could shape awards season? Take a look at what Hollywood insiders are saying about the 2026 Oscars.

A small red sheet of paper with 'legacy' written on it.

What this means moving forward

The controversy surrounding the snub has now become part of the broader legacy of the film. It highlights how awards-season decisions can be influenced by factors beyond the quality of on-screen work or artistic achievement.

Fans will likely continue to discuss and debate the Oscar exclusion for months to come. For now, the situation underscores how perception, promotion, public behavior, and performance can intersect in Hollywood, shaping both reputations and future campaign strategies.

Wondering where the story could go from here? See what’s being said about the future of Wicked on the big screen.

Do you think the snub will affect the future of the Wicked films? Share your thoughts in the comments!

This slideshow was made with AI assistance and human editing.

Don’t forget to follow us for more exclusive content right here on MSN.

Read More From This Brand:

This is exclusive content for our subscribers

Enter your email address to subscribe and get instant FREE access to all of our articles

Was this helpful?
Thumbs UP Thumbs Down
Prev Next
Share this post

Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!

Send feedback to NashvilleGab

Close Feedback Form



    We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.

    Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.