6 min read
The legal dispute between It Ends With Us co-stars Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni has taken a stunning turn with newly released court documents.
The ongoing legal battle, which centers on Lively’s claims of harassment and a hostile work environment during the film’s production, now includes explosive internal messages from Baldoni. These filings reveal the actor-director’s private fears about Lively’s public influence, going so far as to claim she could “play the victim” by using a public relations tactic he offensively labeled the “Taylor Swift playbook.”
This high-stakes Hollywood feud is no longer just about on-set conduct; it’s a battle over narrative, power, and the cultural influence of celebrity.
Here’s what you need to know about the staggering accusations.
In messages disclosed in the court filings, Justin Baldoni explicitly feared Blake Lively’s ability to control the public narrative surrounding their professional conflict.
The remarks, according to PageSix, were reportedly sent to a friend group after Lively had already complained to Human Resources about feeling “uncomfortable” on set. Baldoni wrote, “If she doesn’t promote the movie, she could say I’m a bad person or that she felt unsafe with me… Then she’s the victim. It’s the Taylor Swift playbook.“
This comment positions one of the world’s most influential pop culture figures, Taylor Swift, who is Lively’s long-time friend, as a blueprint for public victimhood. Baldoni’s message suggests a belief that a highly public figure like Lively could leverage a personal narrative to generate widespread public support.
He characterized Lively’s ability to generate public sympathy and influence media headlines as a deliberate, manipulative strategy. The actor also separately admitted that he believed Lively held a “nuclear bomb” of influence, which extended not only through her own fame but through her high-profile social circle, including Swift and her husband Ryan Reynolds, whom he referred to as Lively’s “dragons.”

Blake Lively’s lawsuit against Justin Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Studios, alleges sexual harassment and a coordinated smear campaign.
Lively filed a legal complaint with the California Civil Rights Department in December 2024, which she followed with an official lawsuit. The complaint alleges that Baldoni created a hostile and toxic work environment through inappropriate comments and behavior.
The allegations claim Baldoni made offensive and inappropriate comments during a crisis meeting.
Lively’s legal team has maintained that the actress’s objections to this behavior were met with retaliation, including an alleged orchestrated public relations effort to “destroy” her reputation.
The conflict between the two actors reportedly began as a dispute over creative control of the film, based on the best-selling book of the same name.
Lively, who was a producer on the film, is alleged by Baldoni to have used her power to try and push her own creative vision. Baldoni’s $400 million countersuit, which was later dismissed by a judge, alleged that Lively attempted to “hijack” the production, gain creative control, and retaliated against him for refusing her demands.
Baldoni’s countersuit, which a judge dismissed earlier in 2025, also claimed that the actress and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, had attempted to tarnish his reputation. Lively and Reynolds have consistently denied Baldoni’s claims, with Lively’s legal team referring to Baldoni’s counterclaim as “another chapter in the abuser playbook,” using the acronym DARVO: Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim Offender.
This specific claim demonstrates how the legal battle has devolved from a standard workplace dispute into a high-stakes, public war of words between PR machines.
Justin Baldoni’s legal team attempted to subpoena Taylor Swift for a deposition earlier in the year.
Baldoni’s lawyers claimed that the pop star was an eyewitness to a heated confrontation between Baldoni and Ryan Reynolds. This alleged confrontation occurred inside Reynolds’ New York penthouse and reportedly involved Reynolds accusing Baldoni of “fat-shaming” his wife.
Swift’s presence at the scene, even as an incidental attendee, was sought by Baldoni’s team to allegedly prove that Lively used the star to coerce him into making concessions on the film. Swift’s lawyers quickly pushed back, stating she “has no material role in this action” and should not be dragged into the matter.
While a court ultimately denied Baldoni’s petition to subpoena the global superstar, the mere inclusion of her name in the legal filings highlights the intense and far-reaching nature of this public dispute.

Yes, the civil lawsuit is officially headed to trial, with a March 2026 start date originally scheduled.
Lively’s team is seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in damages, claiming severe financial, business, and reputational losses due to the alleged hostile work environment and subsequent smear campaign. While a judge recently recommended the parties seek a settlement, Lively has insisted on having her “day in court,” making it clear she is not interested in settling the matter outside of a courtroom.
The trial is anticipated to be a highly publicized event, as it will dissect the interactions between two major Hollywood figures and touch upon major issues of workplace conduct. Baldoni continues to vehemently deny all of Lively’s claims, and his legal team insists they have evidence that directly refutes her accusations of sexual harassment.
This legal battle has become a significant test case for celebrity workplace conduct, especially in the #MeToo era.
If you liked this, don’t forget to follow us for more news and stories like this one.
If you liked this, you might also like:
Colleen Hoover speaks out with her side amid the Blake Lively and Baldoni feud
Blake Lively alleges Justin Baldoni is avoiding accountability for troubled set atmosphere
This article was made with AI assistance and human editing.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.
Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!