6 min read
George Clooney and Brad Pitt’s new film, “Wolfs,” which had a staggering $200 million budget, has been heavily criticized by reviewers. The film, which will hit theaters on September 20 and is also set to stream on Apple TV+, is a buddy-cop comedy that seems to have missed the mark.
The movie’s plot revolves around Clooney and Pitt as two mismatched cops who have to team up to solve a case involving a dead body. The twist is that the body belongs to a young person who had a one-night stand with a tough district attorney. Despite the star power and a huge budget, “Wolfs” has been labeled a disappointment.

Credit: @appletv
“Wolfs” stars George Clooney and Brad Pitt in their classic buddy-cop roles. The storyline kicks off when a district attorney, known for her tough stance on crime, wakes up next to a dead body of a young person she had a one-night stand with.
This unexpected twist forces her to work with two reluctant cops, played by Clooney and Pitt, to untangle the mess.
While the concept sounds intriguing, critics have slammed the execution. According to reviews, the film is riddled with issues from the start and fails to deliver on its comedic promises.

Credit: @bradpittofflcial
Here’s a breakdown of what critics have said about “Wolfs”:
Critics agree that the film’s high budget and star-studded cast couldn’t compensate for its weak plot and uninspired dialogue. They argue that the movie feels like it’s trying to coast on the fame of its leads rather than offering a solid story.
Lack of Freshness: “Wolfs” suffers from a noticeable absence of originality. The film’s plot, featuring two mismatched partners forced to work together, feels like a tired cliché.
Critics argue that the humor is stale and relies too much on overused jokes. The constant jokes about the characters’ reluctance to work together quickly become monotonous, making the film feel like a rehash of other buddy-cop comedies.
Performances: Despite the star power of George Clooney and Brad Pitt, their performances in “Wolfs” have been widely criticized for lacking enthusiasm. Reviewers suggest that both actors seem to be going through the motions rather than bringing their usual charm to the screen.
This “auto-piloted” approach makes their performances feel flat and uninspired, which detracts from the film’s potential to be engaging or entertaining.
Script Issues: The screenplay for “Wolfs” has been labeled as half-baked. Critics point out that the dialogue often falls flat, with jokes that fail to land.
There were opportunities to delve into more interesting subplots, such as themes of aging, but these ideas are only briefly touched upon and never fully explored. As a result, the film feels incomplete, lacking both humor and emotional depth.
Overall Execution: Reviewers have noted that the overall execution of “Wolfs” is disappointing. Although the film runs for 108 minutes, it feels much longer due to its repetitive and uninspired content.
The pacing slows down, and the humor grows repetitive, leading to a tedious viewing experience. The film struggles to keep the audience engaged, resulting in a long and laborious watch.
Direction and Style: The direction by Jon Watts, known for his work on the Spider-Man films, has also come under fire.
Critics feel that Watts’s direction lacks the energy and innovation seen in his previous projects. Instead, “Wolfs” comes off as formulaic and uninspired, failing to offer anything new or exciting in the buddy-cop genre.
Visual and Technical Aspects: On the technical side, “Wolfs” has not impressed many critics. Despite the film’s hefty budget, the visual presentation falls flat.
The cinematography and production design are seen as average, with few standout moments. This visual mediocrity adds to the sense that the film is a missed opportunity, failing to use its resources to create something memorable.
In summary, “Wolfs” is a film that falls short in several key areas. Its lack of originality, uninspired performances, weak script, and overall execution contribute to its disappointing reception. The film’s struggles highlight the challenge of turning a big budget and high expectations into a successful and engaging movie.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Film Title | Wolfs |
| Budget | $200 million |
| Release Date | September 20 (Theaters), Streaming on Apple TV+ |
| Directors | Jon Watts |
| Main Cast | George Clooney, Brad Pitt |
| Plot Summary | Cops team up to solve a case involving a dead body and a DA |
| Critics’ Rating | Mostly one-star reviews, described as a “messy” and “half-baked” film |
| Key Critic Comments | Comparisons to a “slick student film” and criticisms of lackluster performances and repetitive humor |
| Runtime | 108 minutes |
Overall, “Wolfs” is seen as a high-profile flop that fails to deliver on its promises, making it an example of how even big budgets and star power cannot guarantee success.
We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.
Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that
isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.
Lucky you! This thread is empty,
which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
Go for it!