Table of content
    Was this helpful?
    Thumbs UP Thumbs Down

    Brad Pitt notches key win in Angelina Jolie court fight as judge orders release of private messages


    Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt at an event.
    Table of Contents

    Brad Pitt has secured a major procedural victory in his ongoing legal battle with Angelina Jolie over their French winery, Château Miraval.

    A Los Angeles Superior Court judge recently ruled that Jolie must produce a cache of private, unredacted communications that she had previously sought to keep under wraps. The ruling, handed down by Judge Lia Martin, marks a significant turning point in a case that has spanned several years and cost millions in legal fees.

    This decision gives Pitt’s legal team access to 22 documents containing emails and text messages exchanged between Jolie and her non-attorney associates. These materials are expected to shed light on the actress’s true motivations regarding the controversial 2021 sale of her stake in the winery.

    Here is a breakdown of the ruling and what it means for the high-stakes trial ahead.

    A significant birthday win for the Hollywood star

    The judge’s decision arrived on December 17, 2025, just one day before Brad Pitt celebrated his 62nd birthday.

    The court order requires Angelina Jolie to provide full, unredacted versions of specific communications within a 45-day window. These documents were previously identified on a privilege log but were withheld by Jolie’s team under claims of attorney-client privilege.

    The court found that because these messages were exchanged between non-attorneys, they do not automatically qualify for legal protection. The ruling emphasizes that business strategy and personal communications are not shielded simply because a lawsuit is pending.

    Pitt’s legal team argued that Jolie has been using privilege claims to “bury critical documents” that go to the heart of the dispute.

    Brad Pitt at a movie premier.
    Source: arp/Depositphotos

    The core of the Château Miraval dispute

    The legal war began in February 2022 when Pitt sued Jolie for selling her 50 percent stake in the winery without his consent.

    Pitt alleges that the former couple had a “mutual understanding” that neither would sell their interest in the $160 million estate without the other’s approval. Jolie has consistently denied that such a binding agreement ever existed.

    The winery, located in Correns, France, was purchased by the pair in 2008 and served as the venue for their 2014 wedding. Pitt claims he poured years of “sweat equity” and millions of dollars into turning the vineyard into a global success. He argues that Jolie’s sale to Tenute del Mondo, a subsidiary of the Stoli Group, was a deliberate attempt to undermine his investment.

    Why are private messages so critical

    A source close to the case indicates that Pitt’s team believes the unredacted messages will prove Jolie acted with “malice” during the sale.

    The documents include communications with her longtime business manager, Terry Bird, and close aides Chloe Dalton and Lady Arminka Helic. These individuals were reportedly involved in the negotiations that led to the sale to Russian billionaire Yuri Shefler.

    Pitt’s attorneys contend that these internal discussions will reveal a calculated plan to bypass Pitt and sell to a party he had specifically opposed. The emails may provide a smoking gun regarding the timing and intent behind the secret negotiations with the Stoli Group. If the messages show that Jolie intentionally avoided a buyout offer from Pitt in favor of a third party, it could devastate her defense.

    The ongoing battle over non-disclosure agreements

    A major sticking point in the litigation is Jolie’s claim that Pitt refused to buy her out unless she signed a restrictive NDA.

    She alleges that the proposed agreement was designed to “silence” her regarding accusations of verbal and physical abuse during a 2016 private jet flight. Pitt’s team maintains that the NDAs he requested were standard for business transactions involving high-value assets.

    In a separate ruling earlier in 2024, the judge ordered Jolie to produce eight years’ worth of other NDAs she had signed with third parties. This was intended to show whether Jolie’s objection to Pitt’s NDA was genuine or a tactical excuse to justify her sale to Stoli.

    By comparing her past history of signing confidentiality agreements, the court aims to determine if Pitt’s request was truly “unprecedented” as she claimed.

    The “War of the Rosés” continues to escalate

    The legal conflict has become so intense and personal that media outlets have dubbed it the “War of the Rosés.”

    Beyond the winery itself, the dispute has touched on every aspect of the former couple’s separation, including custody and financial support. Jolie has accused Pitt of “waging a vindictive war” against her through the courts to maintain control over her life and finances.

    Pitt, meanwhile, is seeking $35 million in damages, claiming that the entry of the Stoli Group has harmed Miraval’s brand and operations. He alleges that the presence of a “hostile” partner makes it impossible to manage the boutique winery as they originally intended. The actor remains committed to restoring his full control over the property where he once hoped his children would grow up.

    What lies ahead for the former couple

    With the discovery phase heating up, both sides are preparing for a massive courtroom showdown set for early 2027.

    Judge Martin has scheduled a trial date for February 1, 2027, ensuring that this legal drama will continue to make headlines for at least another year. Court-ordered mediation is also set to take place in October 2026, though a settlement seems unlikely given the hostility between the parties.

    Angelina Jolie’s legal team, led by Paul Murphy, has expressed disappointment with the latest ruling and indicated plans to appeal. Her lawyers argue that the court’s interpretation of California’s privilege law undermines her right to a fair trial. They maintain that the release of these messages is yet another attempt by Pitt to exert pressure and harassment.

    Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt at an event.
    Source: arp/Depositphotos

    The impact of the ruling on Hollywood legal standards

    Legal experts are closely watching this case for how it handles the intersection of celebrity privacy and corporate litigation.

    It highlights how quickly private digital lives can become public record once a high-stakes lawsuit is filed. Celebrities often rely on non-attorney aides for sensitive business dealings, assuming those conversations stay private. The ruling serves as a warning that any communication not involving a licensed attorney is potentially discoverable in court.

    For Pitt and Jolie, the next 45 days will be pivotal as the unredacted documents are handed over to opposing counsel. The secrets contained within those 22 documents could finally bring a resolution to the winery war, or ignite a whole new firestorm.

    TL;DR

    • Brad Pitt won a procedural victory when a judge ordered Angelina Jolie to release 22 unredacted documents.
    • Judge Lia Martin ruled that communications with non-attorney aides are not protected by legal privilege.
    • The fight centers on the 2021 sale of Jolie’s stake in Château Miraval to the Stoli Group without Pitt’s consent.
    • Jolie claims Pitt used NDAs to silence her; Pitt’s team says they are standard business practice.
    • A trial is scheduled for February 2027, with mediation set for late 2026.

    If you liked this, don’t forget to follow us for more news and stories like this one.

    If you liked this, you might also like:

    Angelina Jolie reveals surprising money deal with Brad Pitt post-divorce

    Brad Pitt Breaks Silence on Angelina Jolie Divorce After Eight Years of Public Turmoil

    This article was made with AI assistance and human editing.

    This is exclusive content for our subscribers

    Enter your email address to subscribe and get instant FREE access to all of our articles

    Was this helpful?
    Thumbs UP Thumbs Down
    Prev Next
    Share this post

    Lucky you! This thread is empty,
    which means you've got dibs on the first comment.
    Go for it!

    Send feedback to NashvilleGab

    Close Feedback Form



      We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback about this page with us.

      Whether it's praise for something good, or ideas to improve something that isn't quite right, we're excited to hear from you.